
1
Corinthians 15:1-34 – The Gospel and the Resurrection of the Dead
(Part 1 of 2) 1
Corinthians 15:1-2 † Paul reminded
them of the gospel as the foundation of their faith. 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 † Paul appealed to
eyewitness testimony as proof of Christ's resurrection. 1 Corinthians 15:9-11 † Paul acknowledged
his past but highlighted God's grace in his apostleship. 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 † Denying
resurrection denied Christ's own resurrection. 1 Corinthians 15:20-23 † Christ was the
first fruits, guaranteeing the harvest of resurrection. 1 Corinthians 15:24-28 † The end was not
the end of time, but the end of the Old Covenant age. 1 Corinthians 15:29-34 † Baptism for the
dead reflected their confidence in resurrection. † This is the fulfilled
perspective we proclaim at Fulfilled Prophecies †
By Dan Maines
Now I make known to you, brothers
and sisters, the gospel which I preached to you, which you also
received, in which you also stand, by which you also are saved, if
you hold firmly to the word which I preached to you, unless you
believed in vain.
†
Holding firmly showed salvation was tied to remaining in the
covenant message.
† Paul tied salvation to
holding firmly, showing resurrection hope was not optional theology,
but covenant faithfulness itself.
For
I handed down to you as of first importance what I also received,
that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that
He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to
the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.
After that He appeared to more than five hundred brothers and
sisters at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have
fallen asleep, then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles,
and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also.
†
The resurrection was rooted in Old Testament prophecy (Isaiah 53,
Hosea 6).
† Many witnesses were still alive
when Paul wrote, confirming the event as historical.
†
Paul stressed "according to the Scriptures" twice, showing
that Christ’s death and resurrection were in full agreement with
Israel’s prophetic expectation, not a new invention.
For
I am the least of the apostles, and not fit to be called an apostle,
because I persecuted the church of God. But by the grace of God I am
what I am, and His grace toward me did not prove vain, but I labored
even more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me.
Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.
†
The same gospel was preached consistently by all the apostles.
†
Paul highlighted unity: "so we preach, and so you believed."
There was no contradiction between his gospel and the others,
refuting claims of later doctrinal corruption.
Now
if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do
some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if
there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been
raised, and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in
vain, your faith also is in vain. Moreover, we are even found to be
false witnesses of God, because we testified against God that He
raised Christ, whom He did not raise, if in fact the dead are not
raised. For if the dead are not raised, then not even Christ has
been raised, and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is
worthless, you are still in your sins. Then also those who have
fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ
only in this life, we are of all people most to be pitied.
†
Paul's logic made resurrection central to the gospel.
†
The resurrection was not a vague hope but the guarantee of covenant
life.
† Paul argued from consequence, if
resurrection was denied, the entire gospel collapsed. This proved
resurrection was covenantal core doctrine, not a side issue.
But
the fact is, Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits
of those who are asleep. For since by a man death came, by a man
also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so
also in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own order,
Christ the first fruits, after that those who are Christ’s at His
coming.
†
Adam brought death, Christ brought life.
†
Those who belonged to Christ would be raised at His coming in AD
70.
† The phrase "each in his own
order" shows resurrection was a process, Christ first, then
those at His coming. This makes sense only in the AD 70 framework,
not a far-off future event.
Then
comes the end, when He hands over the kingdom to our God and Father,
when He has abolished all rule and all authority and power. For He
must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet. The last
enemy that will be abolished is death. For He has put all things in
subjection under His feet. But when He says, All things are put in
subjection, it is clear that this excludes the Father who put all
things in subjection to Him. When all things are subjected to Him,
then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected
all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.
†
Christ reigned until all enemies were subjected, climaxing in AD
70.
† Death was abolished covenantally when
fellowship with God was restored.
† Psalm
110:1 lies behind this passage, Christ was reigning until all
enemies were subdued. That reign ended in AD 70, not at some end of
the world.
† The last enemy was covenantal
death (separation from God under the Law), not biological death.
This ties directly back to verses 56-57.
For
otherwise, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the
dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them? Why
are we also in danger every hour? I affirm, brothers and sisters, by
the boasting in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, that I
die daily. If from human motives I fought with wild beasts at
Ephesus, what good is it to me? If the dead are not raised, let’s
eat and drink, for tomorrow we die. Do not be deceived, Bad company
corrupts good morals. Sober up morally and stop sinning, for some
have no knowledge of God. I say this to your shame.
†
Paul's constant suffering made no sense if there was no
resurrection.
† Without resurrection, life
would be meaningless indulgence.
† "Let’s
eat and drink, for tomorrow we die" echoed Isaiah 22:13, where
Israel was condemned for choosing indulgence instead of repentance,
showing the covenantal seriousness of denying resurrection.
†
Paul’s point about baptism for the dead was not teaching a ritual
but highlighting the testimony of the community that resurrection
was real.
Links