
Revelation:
When Was It Written? As a Preterist, I
firmly believe that the Book of Revelation was written before 70 AD.
This is not just a theory, but a conclusion based on internal
scriptural evidence, historical records, and logical reasoning. If
Revelation was written after 70 AD, it could not have served its
intended purpose to warn first-century believers of the coming
judgment upon Jerusalem. Revelation 1:1
sets the tone:
"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God
gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon
take place..."
How could the destruction of Jerusalem in
70 AD be "soon" or "near" if the book was
written in 96 AD? Revelation was urgent for those churches. If it was written
after the temple fell, then the entire urgency becomes pointless.
Yet modern futurists keep stretching words like "soon,"
"at hand," "quickly," and "this
generation" to mean 2,000 years. How long until they redefine
"urgent" too? Historical Timing and Nero The Apostle John was placed on
the island of Patmos by Nero, who died in 68 AD.
This proves Revelation had to be written during Nero's reign (54–68
AD), not under Domitian. Irenaeus is the
one source people use to push a 96 AD date. But Irenaeus did not
say John saw the Revelation during Domitian's reign. In fact, the
word used in the Greek text is Domitius, which
refers to Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, known as
Nero, not Domitian. Christians were not being
persecuted by Rome under Domitian in 96 AD. Rome's persecution
under Nero, however, was brutal. Why would John be exiled in
peace-time? Revelation 2:13 mentions Antipas, a
faithful martyr. History shows Antipas died under Nero, not
Domitian. This aligns with a pre-70 AD authorship. John and the Churches Were in the Same Tribulation Revelation 1:9 – "I, John,
your brother and fellow partaker in the tribulation..."
John
identifies with their suffering. He wasn't writing about a distant
tribulation 2,000 years away. He was living it. Revelation 2:2, 2:9-10, 2:13, 3:10 – These churches were
in the middle of hardship. What event after 96 AD could John have
possibly been warning them about with urgency? There is none. The Temple Was Still Standing Revelation 11:1 – John is told
to measure the temple. How could he do that if it had already been
destroyed in 70 AD? The city is still standing in the text. Revelation 11:8 says
the two witnesses are slain in "the great city which
mystically is called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was
crucified." That is Jerusalem, still standing
during John's writing. More Proof of Pre-70 AD Writing Revelation 2:2
shows apostles were still alive. If the book was written after 70
AD, this would be unlikely, as history shows most apostles had died
by then. Judaizers are mentioned in
Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. After 70 AD, Judaizers were no longer a
threat. They were destroyed along with the temple. Laodicea was destroyed in an
earthquake around 65 AD. Why would John write to them in 96 AD if
they no longer existed? Only 7 churches are addressed. By 96 AD, Christianity had
spread rapidly. Why mention only 7 if others were prominent? John's Gospel and Present Tense Language John 5:2 – "Now there is in Jerusalem... a pool,
which is called Bethesda..."
He writes in the present
tense. Bethesda was destroyed in 70 AD. This suggests his
gospel, and Revelation, were written before then. Political Clues: The Beast, the Kings, and Nero Revelation 17:10 – "Five
kings have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come..."
The
sixth king, "who now is," would be Nero,
the sixth emperor of Rome. This means Revelation was written before
68 AD. Revelation 13:18 – "His
number is 666."
Nero Caesar's name in Hebrew gematria
equals 666. Why would John urge readers to
"calculate" this number if the person would not be born
for another 2,000 years? That would be nonsense. The beast was
alive when Revelation was written. Nero persecuted Christians for 42 months
(Rev. 13:5) – from late 64 AD until his death in 68 AD. That fits
perfectly. Jerusalem Is Babylon the Great Revelation 17:6, 18:24 – The
city is "drunk with the blood of the saints."
Jesus
said the same of Jerusalem in Matthew 23:34-38. In verse 38, He
declares: "Behold, your house is left to you
desolate."
Revelation 18:20-24 confirms the judgment of
the prophets' killers. That was Jerusalem, not Rome, not a future
one-world government. Daniel 9:27 and Luke 21:20 tie into this. Luke says: "When
you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her
desolation is at hand."
That happened from 66-70 AD. Final Considerations Revelation 10:11 – John is told
he "must prophesy again before many peoples and nations and
tongues and kings."
At 90+ years old in 96 AD, John could
not travel and preach widely. But in the 60s AD, he could. Church
tradition even notes that in his old age, John had to be carried to
church and barely spoke. The siege of Jerusalem began in
66 AD and lasted 3.5 years. Revelation 11:2-3 speaks of 42 months,
or 1,260 days. That fits perfectly with the Roman siege that ended
in 70 AD. The two witnesses are killed in the city where Jesus was
crucified – again, Jerusalem. Not Rome. Not America. Not some
future Babylon. Conclusion: Do Not Ignore the
Time Statements Revelation begins and ends with a clear time marker: Revelation 1:1 – "Things
which must soon take place." Revelation 22:10 – "The time is near." If we ignore these time statements, we
risk misunderstanding the entire New Testament. The Bible interprets
itself. The destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD is the fulfillment of
the prophecy Jesus gave in Matthew 24. Revelation simply confirms
and expands on it. Revelation was not written in 96 AD.
It was written around 67 or 68 AD, during the reign of Nero, while
the temple still stood. It was fulfilled in the events leading up to
and including the destruction of Jerusalem. It was not written for a
far-off generation, but for the first-century saints who were told
to expect those things soon. Let us not misplace prophecy. Let us
believe Jesus when He said, "Truly I say to you, this
generation will not pass away until all these things take place"
(Matthew 24:34). Revelation is not about our future. It
is about their future, and our
fulfilled past. He did what He said He would
do, when He said He would do it.
By Dan Maines
Links