
Scriptures Futurists Cannot
Refute: Let The Bible Answer For Itself Introduction Matthew 24:34 Matthew 16:27-28 Luke 21:20-22 Revelation 1:1, 3 Revelation 22:6-7, 10, 12 Hebrews 10:37 James 5:8-9 1 Peter 4:7 1 John 2:18 1 Corinthians 10:11 Daniel 12:1-2, 7 Hebrews 8:13 Colossians 1:23 Historical References How It Applies To Us Today Q & A Appendix Q: Doesn't Matthew 24 describe events that
haven't happened yet? Q: Couldn't this generation mean a future
generation? Q: Doesn't the Transfiguration fulfill Matthew
16:28? Q: Doesn't God measure time differently from
humans? Q: Doesn't the Bible teach a future
resurrection? Q: Doesn't the end of all things mean the
destruction of the universe? Q: Isn't the Antichrist still coming? Q: Wasn't the Great Commission supposed to
continue until the end of the world? Q: Doesn't a future Jewish temple have to be
built? Q: If prophecy has been fulfilled, what are
Christians supposed to do now? Q: Can futurists simply dismiss all these time
statements as symbolic? Q: What is the strongest evidence for the
fulfilled perspective? Conclusion † This is the fulfilled perspective we proclaim at
Fulfilled Prophecies † Source Index
By Dan Maines
† What
happens when we allow Scripture to explain prophecy instead of
allowing modern prophecy teachers to tell us what Scripture must
mean? We discover that Jesus and His apostles repeatedly identified
when the promised events would take place. They weren't describing
events thousands of years beyond their own generation.
†
Futurism depends on moving prophetic fulfillment into our future. Yet
Jesus said this generation, John said the time is near, James said
the Judge was standing at the door, and Peter said the end of all
things was near. These weren't vague statements. They were
declarations addressed to people living in the first century (Matthew
24:34; Revelation 1:3; James 5:9; 1 Peter 4:7).
†
The fulfilled perspective doesn't require us to deny the coming of
Christ, the resurrection, the judgment, or the establishment of the
New Jerusalem. We believe these promises were fulfilled according to
the time statements God gave. The question isn't whether these events
were promised. The question is whether we believe the timing
Scripture assigned to them.
† No passage is
beyond discussion, and futurists offer different interpretations.
However, any interpretation must account for the actual words,
audience, and historical setting of Scripture. Let's examine the
evidence and allow the Bible to answer the objections.
Truly I say to you, this
generation will not pass away until all these things take place.
†
Jesus identified the generation that would witness the fulfillment of
His prophecy. He was speaking to His disciples about the destruction
of the temple they had just discussed (Matthew 24:1-3).
†
Some futurists argue that this generation means the generation that
sees the final signs. However, Jesus had already used this generation
when addressing His contemporaries and warning of judgment upon
Jerusalem (Matthew 23:36-38).
† Luke records
the same generation statement while explicitly identifying
Jerusalem's surrounding armies and approaching desolation (Luke
21:20-24, 32). The fulfilled interpretation keeps the generation and
the judgment within the same historical setting.
†
If Jesus meant a generation thousands of years later, where did He
tell His disciples that this generation would no longer refer to
their contemporaries? The immediate context provides no such
announcement (Matthew 23:36; 24:34).
For the Son of Man is going
to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and WILL THEN
REPAY EVERY MAN ACCORDING TO HIS DEEDS.
Truly I say to you,
there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste
death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
†
Jesus connected His coming, judgment, and kingdom with the lifetime
of some people standing before Him. His audience wasn't a generation
living thousands of years later (Mark 8:38-9:1).
†
Futurists often identify verse 28 with the Transfiguration. However,
verse 27 speaks of judgment and repayment according to deeds.
Revelation connects that same judgment language with Christ's coming
quickly (Revelation 22:12).
† The
Transfiguration revealed Christ's glory, but the fulfilled
perspective understands His promised coming in judgment as reaching
its covenantal fulfillment in AD 70. Jesus' statement about those
standing there establishes a first-century time boundary (Matthew
24:30-34).
But when you see Jerusalem
surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is
near.
because these are days of vengeance, so that all things
which are written will be fulfilled.
† Jesus
didn't tell His disciples to watch for a modern political alliance or
a future rebuilt temple. He told them to recognize Jerusalem
surrounded by armies (Luke 21:20-21).
† He
called the approaching destruction days of vengeance and connected it
with the fulfillment of what had been written. This agrees with His
earlier warning that judgment would fall upon that generation
(Matthew 23:35-38).
† Futurists sometimes
separate Luke's account from Matthew's and place Matthew's
fulfillment in the distant future. Yet both accounts describe
Jerusalem's crisis, great distress, and the generation that would
witness these events (Matthew 24:15-21, 34; Luke 21:20-24, 32).
†
The destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 supplies the historical setting
for the fulfilled perspective. The city, temple, armies, and
generation all belong together.
The Revelation of Jesus
Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things
which must soon take place; and He sent and communicated it by His
angel to His bond-servant John,
Blessed is he who reads and
those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which
are written in it; for the time is near.
†
Revelation begins by identifying its intended audience and the
nearness of its fulfillment. The message was given to Christ's
bond-servants, and its original readers were expected to hear and
obey it (Revelation 1:4, 11).
† Futurists
sometimes argue that soon describes how rapidly events will unfold
once they begin. However, John also says the time is near. The
combined statements naturally communicate approaching fulfillment to
the original audience (Revelation 22:6-7, 10).
†
A prophecy addressed to first-century churches shouldn't
automatically be transferred into our future. The seven churches were
actual congregations facing actual circumstances, and Christ
addressed them directly (Revelation 2:1-3:22).
†
The fulfilled perspective understands Revelation as describing the
approaching covenantal judgment and the full establishment of the New
Covenant order, not a timetable for modern world events (Hebrews
8:13; Revelation 21:1-3).
And he said to me,
These words are faithful and true; and the Lord, the God of the
spirits of the prophets, sent His angel to show to His bond-servants
the things which must soon take place.
And behold, I am coming
quickly. Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this
book.
And he said to me, Do not seal up the words of the
prophecy of this book, for the time is near.
Behold, I am coming
quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according
to what he has done.
† Revelation closes with
the same urgency with which it began. The events must soon take
place, Christ is coming quickly, and the time is near (Revelation
1:1-3).
† John was specifically told not to
seal the prophecy. Daniel, by contrast, was told to seal his book
until the time of the end. The different instructions deserve careful
attention (Daniel 12:4, 9).
† Futurists may
argue that God's perspective on time differs from ours. However,
Revelation's repeated time statements were communicated to human
readers who were instructed to respond to an approaching event
(Revelation 1:3; 22:10).
† Christ's promise
to come quickly with His reward also parallels His statement to those
standing before Him that He would come and repay according to deeds
(Matthew 16:27-28).
† If the fulfillment was
intended to remain thousands of years away, the command not to seal
the prophecy because the time was near becomes difficult to explain.
FOR YET IN A VERY LITTLE
WHILE, HE WHO IS COMING WILL COME, AND WILL NOT DELAY.
†
Hebrews encouraged believers who were enduring persecution and needed
perseverance. The writer assured them that the promised coming would
not be delayed (Hebrews 10:32-36).
† The
expression a very little while was directed to those original
believers. The fulfilled perspective understands that assurance in
connection with the approaching conclusion of the Old Covenant age
(Hebrews 8:13; 9:26).
† Futurism must explain
why the writer used such immediate language if the promised coming
was intended to remain unfulfilled for thousands of years.
†
Hebrews doesn't describe an endlessly postponed covenantal
transition. It identifies the first covenant as obsolete and ready to
disappear (Hebrews 8:13).
You too be patient; strengthen
your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is near.
Do not
complain, brethren, against one another, so that you yourselves may
not be judged; behold, the Judge is standing right at the door.
†
James addressed believers experiencing oppression and hardship. He
encouraged patience because the coming of the Lord was near (James
5:1-7).
† The Judge standing at the door
communicates immediate accountability, not an event that James
explicitly assigned to a distant generation (Matthew 24:33-34).
†
Futurists may understand the language as a continuing call to
readiness. Yet James specifically grounded his encouragement in the
nearness of the Lord's coming to his readers (James 5:7-9).
†
The fulfilled perspective recognizes the approaching first-century
judgment as the event that gave urgency to James' instruction.
The end of all things is near;
therefore, be of sound judgment and sober spirit for the purpose of
prayer.
† Peter didn't tell his readers that
the end was thousands of years away. He said it was near and
instructed them to live accordingly (1 Peter 4:5-6).
†
The fulfilled perspective understands this end as the conclusion of
the Old Covenant age, not the destruction of the physical universe.
Hebrews describes that covenant as becoming obsolete and ready to
disappear (Hebrews 8:13).
† Peter also said
judgment was beginning with the household of God. That statement
connects his warning with the judgment circumstances confronting the
first-century church (1 Peter 4:17).
†
Futurists who interpret this as the end of the physical world must
explain why Peter announced its nearness to his original readers.
Children, it is the last hour;
and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many
antichrists have appeared; from this we know that it is the last
hour.
† John didn't say the last hour would
begin thousands of years later. He said it was already the last hour,
and he identified the appearance of many antichrists as evidence (1
John 2:19).
† John described these opponents
as people who had gone out from the Christian community. His concern
was an existing first-century situation, not a prediction requiring
one future political dictator (1 John 2:19, 22).
†
The fulfilled perspective connects John's last hour with the closing
period of the Old Covenant age, consistent with the apostles' other
statements about approaching fulfillment (1 Corinthians 10:11;
Hebrews 9:26).
† Futurism must account for
John's declaration that the last hour had already arrived.
Now these things
happened to them as an example, and they were written for our
instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.
†
Paul said the ends of the ages had come upon his own generation. He
didn't describe them as something awaiting people thousands of years
in the future (Hebrews 9:26).
† The
expression concerns the culmination of the ages in God's redemptive
purpose. The fulfilled perspective connects that culmination with the
transition from the Old Covenant to the New Covenant (Hebrews
8:6-13).
† Paul wrote these words to the
Corinthian believers and included himself among those living at the
ends of the ages. His statement must be interpreted within that
original setting (1 Corinthians 1:2; 10:11).
Now at that time Michael,
the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will
arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred
since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your
people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be
rescued.
Many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will
awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and
everlasting contempt.
I heard the man dressed in linen, who was
above the waters of the river, as he raised his right hand and his
left toward heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever that it would
be for a time, times, and half a time; and as soon as they finish
shattering the power of the holy people, all these events will be
completed.
† Daniel connects unparalleled
distress, deliverance, resurrection, and the completion of these
events within the same prophetic setting (Daniel 12:1-7).
†
Jesus applied Daniel's unparalleled distress language to the crisis
facing Judea and Jerusalem, and He placed that crisis within His
generation (Matthew 24:15-21, 34).
† Daniel
identifies the shattering of the power of the holy people as the
point at which these events reach completion. The fulfilled
perspective understands this as the final destruction of Israel's Old
Covenant national and temple order in AD 70 (Luke 21:20-24).
†
Futurists generally place Daniel's resurrection in the future, but
the fulfilled interpretation argues that the resurrection must be
understood within Daniel's own stated prophetic timeframe (Daniel
12:1-7).
† This doesn't deny the
resurrection. It understands the promised resurrection covenantally,
as the completion of redemption and deliverance from the condemnation
associated with the old order (1 Corinthians 15:54-57; Hebrews 9:15).
When He said, A new covenant,
He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and
growing old is ready to disappear.
† Hebrews
distinguishes the New Covenant from the Old Covenant and declares the
first obsolete. The writer also describes it as ready to disappear
(Hebrews 8:6-12).
† The fulfilled perspective
understands the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in AD 70 as
the historical removal of the remaining institutional Old Covenant
order (Matthew 24:1-2).
† Futurism often
expects a future Jewish temple to play a central prophetic role. Yet
Hebrews identifies Christ as the greater High Priest whose sacrifice
accomplished what the old sacrificial system couldn't (Hebrews
9:11-14; 10:11-18).
† The New Covenant
doesn't require the restoration of animal sacrifices or a rebuilt
temple. God's people are now His dwelling place through the Spirit
(Ephesians 2:19-22).
if indeed you continue in
the faith firmly established and steadfast, and not moved away from
the hope of the gospel that you have heard, which was proclaimed in
all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, was made a
minister.
† Paul described the gospel as
already proclaimed in all creation under heaven. His statement must
be understood according to the first-century world and the language
he used (Romans 10:18).
† Jesus had declared
that the gospel of the kingdom would be preached throughout the
inhabited world as a testimony to the nations before the end (Matthew
24:14).
† The fulfilled perspective
understands Paul's declaration as evidence that the gospel
proclamation associated with that prophetic period had reached its
intended fulfillment before AD 70 (Romans 16:25-26; Colossians
1:6).
† Futurists who insist Matthew 24:14
remains unfulfilled must account for Paul's explicit statement about
the gospel's proclamation.
†
Flavius Josephus, writing in The Jewish War, Books 2-7, described the
Jewish revolt, Jerusalem's siege, famine, internal conflict, and the
destruction of the temple in AD 70. His historical record provides
important evidence concerning the judgment upon Jerusalem (Luke
21:20-24).
† Tacitus, in Histories, Book 5,
also discussed the Jewish war and the circumstances surrounding
Jerusalem's destruction. His account provides non-Christian
historical testimony to the first-century conflict (Matthew
24:1-2).
† Eusebius, in Ecclesiastical
History, Book 3, Chapter 5, recorded the tradition that Christians in
Jerusalem departed for Pella before the city's destruction. This
tradition is relevant to Jesus' warning that those in Judea should
flee (Luke 21:20-21).
† These writers provide
historical context, not the authority for our doctrine. Scripture
establishes the prophetic claims, while historical testimony helps us
examine the events associated with their fulfillment (Luke 21:22).
†
We don't need to live in fear of a future Antichrist, a seven-year
tribulation, or the destruction of the physical earth. The fulfilled
perspective recognizes that the apostolic warnings concerned the
approaching end of the Old Covenant age (1 John 2:18; Hebrews
8:13).
† We aren't waiting for Christ to
establish His kingdom. Believers have already been transferred into
the kingdom of God's beloved Son (Colossians 1:13).
†
We aren't waiting for another temple to restore access to God.
Through Christ, believers already have access to the Father in one
Spirit (Ephesians 2:18-22).
† We don't need
to search modern headlines for the fulfillment of prophecies that
Jesus assigned to His generation. Our calling is to live faithfully,
love one another, and proclaim the gospel (Matthew 24:34; John
13:34-35).
† Fulfilled prophecy doesn't mean
God's work has ended. Christ continues to reign, His kingdom remains,
and believers continue to enjoy fellowship with Him (Hebrews 12:28;
Ephesians 3:21).
† Our confidence rests in
Christ's faithfulness. He accomplished redemption, established the
New Covenant, and fulfilled His promises according to God's purpose
(Hebrews 9:15; 10:12-18).
A: Jesus identified
Jerusalem's temple, warned of its destruction, and placed the events
within this generation. The fulfilled perspective connects the
prophecy with Jerusalem's first-century judgment (Matthew 24:1-3, 34;
Luke 21:20-24, 32).
A: Jesus used this generation for
His contemporaries when announcing judgment upon Jerusalem. The same
expression appears in the following discourse (Matthew 23:36; 24:34).
A: The Transfiguration revealed Christ's
glory, but Matthew 16:27 also includes judgment and repayment
according to deeds. The fulfilled perspective connects that broader
promise with Christ's coming in judgment (Matthew 16:27-28;
Revelation 22:12).
A: God is eternal, but Revelation's
time statements were addressed to actual first-century churches. John
repeatedly said the events were near and must soon take place
(Revelation 1:1-4; 22:6-10).
A: Daniel connects resurrection
with the distress and completion of events involving his people. The
fulfilled perspective understands the promised resurrection as
completed in the covenantal transition culminating in AD 70 (Daniel
12:1-7; 1 Corinthians 15:54-57).
A: The fulfilled
perspective understands Peter's statement in the context of the
approaching covenantal judgment. Hebrews identifies the old order as
obsolete and ready to disappear (1 Peter 4:7, 17; Hebrews 8:13).
A:
John said many antichrists had already appeared and identified that
as evidence of the last hour. He described opponents already active
in his day (1 John 2:18-22).
A: The
church's mission of proclaiming Christ continues, but Paul described
the gospel as already proclaimed throughout creation under heaven.
The fulfilled perspective distinguishes the first-century prophetic
proclamation from the church's continuing mission (Matthew 24:14;
Colossians 1:23; Ephesians 3:21).
A: Hebrews teaches that Christ's
sacrifice is sufficient and that the Old Covenant has become
obsolete. Believers are God's dwelling place through the Spirit
(Hebrews 8:13; 10:11-18; Ephesians 2:19-22).
A: We're called
to love one another, proclaim Christ, grow in faith, and live as
citizens of His established kingdom (John 13:34-35; Colossians 1:13;
Hebrews 12:28).
A: Symbolic prophecy
still requires interpretation according to its audience and context.
Jesus identified His generation, and Revelation repeatedly announced
approaching fulfillment. Those statements must be explained rather
than ignored (Matthew 24:34; Revelation 1:1-3; 22:6-10).
A: The combined
testimony of Jesus, Paul, Peter, James, and John. Their statements
consistently place the climactic events of their prophetic
expectation within the first-century setting (Matthew 16:27-28;
24:34; 1 Corinthians 10:11; James 5:8-9; 1 Peter 4:7; 1 John 2:18;
Revelation 22:10).
† The
fulfilled perspective isn't built upon one isolated verse. It rests
upon the combined testimony of Jesus and His apostles concerning the
audience, timing, and nature of prophetic fulfillment (Matthew 24:34;
Revelation 1:1-3).
† Futurists can offer
alternative interpretations, but those interpretations must account
for every time statement, every original audience, and every
connection Scripture makes between the promised events (Luke
21:20-22; Hebrews 10:37).
† We don't need to
change soon into thousands of years, this generation into an
unidentified future generation, or the last hour into an age that
continues indefinitely. We believe Scripture should be understood
according to its original context (Matthew 24:34; 1 John 2:18;
Revelation 22:6-10).
† Jesus Christ is
faithful. His kingdom is established, His New Covenant remains, and
His people can live in the confidence that God's redemptive promises
have been fulfilled (Colossians 1:13; Hebrews 12:28).
© Fulfilled Prophecies - Dan
Maines.
† Matthew
24:34; Matthew 16:27-28; Luke 21:20, 22; Revelation 1:1, 3;
Revelation 22:6-7, 10, 12; Hebrews 10:37; James 5:8-9; 1 Peter 4:7; 1
John 2:18; 1 Corinthians 10:11; Daniel 12:1-2, 7; Hebrews 8:13;
Colossians 1:23.
† Flavius Josephus, The
Jewish War, Books 2-7; Tacitus, Histories, Book 5; Eusebius,
Ecclesiastical History, Book 3, Chapter 5.
Links